Exhibit 6

  Exhibit 6

 

                                                                                              August 21, 2025 

 

Hello Jim, 

I’ve been trying to think of how to solve things. It’s difficult because I want to respond in just a loving personal way and a business solution way, but because of the last communication being a legal one, I need to address that as well.  I hope this response is received well by the two of you even though it is attempting to simultaneously respond from those multiple perspectives.  I apologize in advance for the length as it was difficult to try and blend all of these lenses and I also thought perhaps having it in writing would be beneficial for you to review. 

Personal Relationship 

  1. I start here as that’s what is most important to me.   
  2. Regardless of what happens on the business side, my love for you and Sandy will not change.  That is the primary reason why I did the Legacy Sale in the first place, because I cared so much about the health and well-being of you both and saw (and frankly couldn’t just sit by) the toll that financial stress was taking on you. 

Way That’s Not Working Best (From Scott Perspective) 

  1. Legal “Innuendos”:  There have now been multiple legal innuendos made and candidly that feels like a bit of a “slap in the face” when someone who you have indicated you love has paid essentially $1M at a time that it was needed, and even advanced over $100k prior to even having an agreement in place.  
  2. Linking PV and TC:  We have consistently said that these items are separate, and I even have that documented as your first “acknowledgement” that you did in the excel sheet.  To now link them is not appropriate from my perspective. 
  3. Demanding things:  Again, from my perspective, it doesn’t feel right to say “I demand a meeting with Scott/Julie”.  Because legally, the members are not Scott and Julie, but PV Legacy Investment, LP, of which I am the managing member.  If you are pursuing a business meeting, then that is the formal attendees.      

Way that Might Work Best (From Scott’s Perspective) 

  1. Some Appreciation:   It would mean a lot to me to have even some appreciation for the fact Scott has paid $1M out of $2.5M (40%).  Appreciate the risk taken to deplete cash now, so we can both win together long-term (and yes, it absolutely would be a win for Scott/Julie).  Also, to acknowledge that he said upfront that he didn’t have 

the ability to pay it all and relied on: a) Northbound sale or big wins, b) Future projects together and/or c) Future equity raises 

  1. Solution-Oriented Business Perspective:   I suggest we work together from a 

solution-oriented business perspective vs. a legal perspective. 

  1. Complete the Tartar Transaction Together:  After huge effort by both of us, we have the right buyer willing to pay enough money that all of this problem is solved. 

Pleasant Valley 

  1. I’ve spoken with Julie multiple times about it and we are aligned in our perspective as follows. 
  2. We have a different “world-view” regarding Pleasant Valley Transaction than 

Jim/Sandy 

  1. Scott/Julie Worldview:  
    1. We helped as best we could in a time of need for people that we love 
    2. We were clear that we did not have the cash to do it all (that’s why we needed to bring in investors) 
    3. We took a risk to do what we could and hope things would go well and we can do all payments 
    4. Things have not gone as well as hoped but that doesn’t change our passion for wanting to complete the legacy sale 
    5. We need to pause payments until some of the events above happen, which I can explain in more detail when we meet 
    6. But then we are very focused to restart the payments 
    7. We would like Jim/Sandy to be appreciative of what was done and what efforts were made.  Instead, it feels the opposite.   
    8. All of that said, we are still firmly in the camp that this is a win-win transaction.  We are incredibly amazed at your ability to continue making Pleasant Valley even more beautiful. 
  2. Jim/Sandy Worldview: 
    1. Scott is not exactly sure of your worldview on the transaction 
    2. Frustrated that payments have stopped which is understandable 
    3. Potentially some fear as well, and certainly a lot of uncertainty iv. Trying to understand your options on the personal, business, and legal levels 

 

Tractor Chariot 

  1. Scott Perspective 
    1. Zach & I have done our job on Tractor Chariot and have generated the right people that are highly interested in the product.  This is also a credit to an incredible invention that you have built. 
    2. We have contacted all of the players in the market and invested literally hundreds of hours into this project, generating interest from major industry players, such as: 
      1. Neil Merricks:  Likes the product and was willing to be a major promoter and distributor for the Tractor Chariot 
      2. Doug Rehor:  When Tartar first said no, we were able to get Doug on board who along with us have got Tartar to re-engage (see below).  To be clear, I have invested a tremendous amount of time in building trust with Doug, which has been a key factor in him working so hard to try and put a deal together with Tartar.  
    3. Tartar 
      1. We not only have found the biggest player that can complete a full purchase and has the scale, manufacturing, distribution to be successful, but we have gotten literally to the top of a $1B company and are in direct discussions with the CEO and the Chief Revenue Officer.  Do you realize how difficult this is to accomplish? ii. We have gotten alignment around an outright purchase model to sell the IP and have very limited post-sale involvement (i.e. meeting the needs of Jim regarding just selling the IP). 
  1. We have qualified the buyer that they are willing to pay 7 figures, with terms to be discussed once they can have their team review the product and design a GTM strategy. 
  2. We have confirmed with them that they want to “move fast” and build this into their plans. 
  3. Latest Tartar Status  

1. I spoke with Doug and explained to him over the course of a longer conversation that it’s going to be far better for the Tartar people to come to Pleasant Valley, than send a unit. 

  1. That allows Jim/Sandy to know “who their dealing with” 
  2. Addresses the issue that if you don’t “see the chariot in action, you might not fully appreciate it’s value” 
  3. Addresses the issue that Jim fully deserves the opportunity to have himself as inventor, product designer and expert fully present the features, benefits, and advantages of the Tractor Chariot. 
  1. Bottom line is that Doug indicated he would go right to Stephen (CEO) and Anthony (Chief Revenue Officer) and look to schedule an in-person visit to Pleasant Valley with one of the two of them (schedules pending) along with any appropriate other Tartar people and Doug.  This is a huge shift and I’m pleased to be able to report it. 
  2. I indicated to Doug that I will reach out to you to coordinate a time for this meeting to happen.   
  1. Here is the proposal I discussed at our last meeting in writing 
    1. We move forward to the next step in the process with Tartar 
    2. My Commitment:  I will get you “everything there is to get” from a transaction with Tartar along the priorities you have established as follows: 
      1. Clean purchase transaction, not a licensing deal 
      2. Prioritize upfront payments, including a good faith “deposit” to cover any legal costs of completing a transaction 
      3. Prioritize guaranteed payments 
      4. Get additional upside payments if it goes very well iii. We split the payments 50/50, less the payment to Zach, as has been agreed to on any contacts that were generated by Scott/Zach. 

iv. The first allocation of my 50 percent of payments I will commit will be utilized to make Pleasant Valley payments.  Although these projects are not linked in any way legally, I will uphold what I said to you in our last meeting as I fully appreciate your situation and want you to receive the full payments of the Legacy Sale. 

  1. Based on the WhatsApp sent this morning (August 21), I need to emphasize a couple things from the legal perspective 
  1. Zach: You are not to contact Zach in any way unless I approve of it.  I am managing Zach and will continue to do so, because a) he has agreed to work “for free” up until this point based on my overall relationship with him, and b) you have recently said you are thinking of changing that he would not be deserving of the 6% we previously agreed to. 
  2. Doug and all other Contacts generated by Scott/Zach are the property of Scott/Zach:  While we didn’t have a formal written contract, we do have in my opinion an enforceable verbal agreement that was reinforced in writing multiple times.  I am owed 50% of the proceeds from a sale if generated by our outreach, less 3% as we both agree that Zach was deserving of 6% to come equally out of our shares.  As is typical with an advisor helping to find buyers for a client, the buyer list is the property of the advisor, and is shared with the client.  I absolutely would find it unacceptable to have you “go around me” and try to complete a transaction with any partner generated by us and not pay that commission.  That would simply violate any and every principle of fairness in my opinion.  Given that, it is my strong recommendation that we agree to a solution between us and work together on Tartar, as otherwise I would be forced to contact Doug and indicate that I believe I am owed proceeds which would create an awkward situation and potentially hurt the chances of completing a transaction.  Given your comments this morning, I want to stress that I will be in contact with Doug to ensure I am not circumvented until we get things clarified.  He is in a great place right now and I want to maintain that for the benefit of us both.  I am absolutely happy to have a conversation with the three of us and have always said this is the case.  The reason there has not been communications is as I mentioned due to wanting to manage the stress that Doug can cause you with his “ideas”. 

Recommended Next Steps Pleasant Valley 

1. Scott- Will continue to pay the $1,200 per month 2. Members Meeting:   

  1. Fully support your ability to call a meeting with the members.  Please notice it appropriately, but just sending me an email to deetzscott@gmail.com is fine and more convenient than a mailed notice, I hereby approve that is an acceptable communication method. 
  2. The members of Pleasant Valley, LLC are Jim Engandela and Sandy 

Engandela, as joint tenants with rights of survivorship and PV Legacy 

Investment, LP, with Scott Deetz as the managing general partner.  Those will be the attendees at the first meeting.  After that meeting, if you would like to have the four of us get together, simply ask personally and not demand legally, and we will be happy to do so.  This is part of the separation of business and personal you have mentioned. 

  1. First Consideration at the meeting – Are you going to pursue legal action? 
    1. If not, then let’s agree that you are not 
    2. If so, then all things have to go through that lens first and let’s discuss how we want to proceed in that lane because the way we have the meeting will need to change if there is a pending legal process that is being considered. 
    3. Per your last notice, I understand the implications of a Capitalization Default.  I understand you have the remedy of selling Pleasant Valley, with the payment provisions and allocations outlined in the 

Agreement.  I also understand the right that PV Legacy Investment, LP will be notified of any potential transaction according to the terms of the ROFR provisions in the agreement now that the threshold of Full Capitalization has been exceeded. 

  1. Other Meeting Agenda Items 
    1. I’m happy to hear your thoughts on the current status and really do care about your opinions. ii. I can also discuss the options for when payments might be able to continue at a partial and/or a full level. 

Tractor Chariot 

  1. Jim Confirms He Will Not Circumvent:  Jim confirms in writing that he will not go around me and that our deal of 50% commission payment will be paid if there is a transaction with any contact that was generated by Scott and Zach contacts anytime in the next 12 months (standard provision to avoid circumvention of an advisor by a client).  Scott will agree that there is no commission if there is a sale to someone that was not contacted by Scott and Zach, unless Jim decides to honor the 10% he has stated previously for a sale that Scott is not involved in. 
  2. Scott Send the NDAs and Non-Circumvents:  Send the full data room of NDAs and non-circumvents.  In a typical legal process, these would be withheld until agreement to be paid is settled above.  However, in an effort to show ongoing trust, these are being sent.  They took a bit to gather because Zach is on his honeymoon and candidly, it is hard to prioritize something with him when they have no commitment of being paid. 
  3. Schedule Meeting with Doug and Tartar:  Pending Jim’s agreement to point 1 above, Scott will contact Doug and schedule a time for the Tartar leadership and Doug to come to Pleasant Valley so we can “wow them” with the product and then move toward a lucrative purchase transaction.  Prior to that meeting, Scott will coordinate a meeting with Doug/Jim/Scott to discuss strategy.  
  4. Complete the Tractor Chariot Deal Together and Secure the Legacy Sale:  When I spoke to Julie about this, she said if she were talking with Jim, she would simply say, “Look at all the people that Scott has changed their lives.  He is every bit the expert in this to the same level that you are the expert in building the Chariot.  Let him finish the job for everyone’s benefit.”  Those comments then sparked the idea that maybe I should share one of the letters I received from people that work with me to both show that capability, but also to show that the end goal is to have us feel that way about each other as well when we achieve success.  It is shown below and candidly is one of many that I have received over the years. 

I’ll end with where I started.  My primary focus is on the love I have for you and Sandy and how we can solve these challenges so we can both work and play together going forward.  Given that focus, I know that the legal process is not the most effective one.  Thanks for taking the time to read this and as always, I’m happy to schedule a zoom to discuss it.  If there is something that “reads wrong” and offends you, I simply ask that you don’t take it that way as it is certainly not my intention. 

Respectfully, 

 

Scott